Ethical arguments against stem cell research

Those who are against such. the ethics behind stem cell research,.Describe three examples of potential benefits from human embryonic stem cell research that are less likely to be achieved by other available approaches.While some (including the Concerned Women for America) have tried to re-shape the Sanctity of Life principle by saying it is only relevant to human life, those seeking to hold this general principle of life as ultimate and absolute have some vicious obstacles to overcome.Particularly under these circumstances, the stem cell field must meet a higher than average standard before approving the first clinical trials with this very new approach to treating disease.National Human Genome Research. against preempting the use.The circumstances under which human eggs or embryos are made available to research are anything but trivial.

Committee on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (2005): Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Even if the early embryo does not have full moral status, it certainly should have some moral status based on its attribute of being alive.Before discussing the specific types and sources of stem cells, I believe it is important to attempt to grasp the broad spectrum of implications which stem cell research can have in clinical applications.As of 2008, South Dakota prohibits hESC research, while some states (e.g., California, New York) have been not only permissive of stem cell research, but have approved significant public funding dedicated to hESC research.This view was apparently proven wrong when the laboratory of Dr.Stem Cell Research: Ethical. mainly advocating against any form of stem cell research and they are all arguing. kind of research.However, whether based on religion or otherwise, most polls show that opponents to hESC research may represent a minority, but that minority is substantial in size and in impact (e.g.,

Against Stem Cell Research Essay - Paper Topics

The pitfalls of this type of move will become more evident in the next section as we look closer at approaches to moral status.The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Finding Common Ground.Article Category Research Reviews Clinical Cases Perspective Commentary Other Browse all Articles.Within the Transitivity of Respect Principle, policy makers and philosophers alike should take into consideration the religious and traditionally held viewpoints of others towards these early embryos, but only where it is feasible or morally permissible to do so.

It remains to be seen whether this will be the case, but this segment of the population is highly attentive and supportive of all that is happening in stem cell research.Public Scrutiny: Stem cell research is likely one of the most watched areas of academic endeavor in the history of academia.We should recognize in this process that not all religious or philosophical values will be realized in a pluralistic society.

If parents or donors take offense at such destruction based on the symbolic value of life, it would be morally objectionable to force such destruction.Almost certainly, because of intense public scrutiny, the landscape for regulations and guidelines has also evolved rapidly.In your institution, what minimal changes (e.g., addition or removal of stem cell lines to be studied) to your protocol require review and approval of the ESCRO or SCRO Committee.It is clear that some individuals and groups are motivated more by philosophical, political, or even economic arguments.Thus, there are utilitarian reasons for adopting a non-classical utilitarian principle.

Adam Rutherford: To stop embryonic and stem cell research

However, the most forceful response to the slippery slope objector is that no such justification for the harming or destroying of human subjects can occur within the application of the full compliment of the multi-criterial principles.For these reasons, this group is also watching stem cell research closely and seeking alternatives that do not require the use of human embryos.

Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues -

Cloning/Embryonic Stem Cells - National Human Genome

If we can agree that the embryo does not hold exactly the same moral status as an adult human, but that the embryo has some status and deserves respect, then the question is what actions and restrictions will most effectively demonstrate sufficient respect for human embryos.Although these findings are intriguing, it remains to be seen whether the various alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells will prove to have the same qualities as the stem cells derived from human embryos (Hyun et al., 2007).Daley, Graduate Student, California State University, Long Beach.ES cell research is touted by many to be the most probable and quickest way to attain these therapies due to the undifferentiated nature of the stem cells as well as the ability of ES cells to overcome immunological concerns.Among the members of this second group, there is a highly principled belief that harm or destruction of a human embryo is the equivalent of harm or destruction of a human child.In order to arrive at any conclusions which hold the hope of widespread support, the nature of this discussion requires a careful accounting of disparate views and a respectful handling of the sometimes emotionally charged responses.These questions are very much hypothetical and, if not impossible, highly improbable under the circumstance that the ethical, legal, scientific, and social environment is not one that favors these goals.

Maintaining my earlier position, I suggest that this is a normative decision aided by science and such decision could be some point around 14 days from conception.Whatever the justification is, it is still a justification to override the principle.Such justification will have to meet a much higher standard and does not follow logically or psychologically from the decision to conduct ES cell research.

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay - Univ112

Stem cell researchers might argue that since the majority of the public favors such research, and presuming that the researchers are working in a jurisdiction that makes such research legal, then they should no longer have to give any more consideration to human embryos or eggs than they might give any other human cell.

Stem cell research pros and cons - netivist

Against Embryonic Stem Cell Research - Catholic Planet

Ethics: Outside the Lab: An Argument for Stem Cell Research

In recent years, biomedical research has been significantly altered by technologies for the derivation of human cell lines capable of differentiation into any of the cells of the human body.In short, mistakes by stem cell researchers are not likely to be overlooked.This fact is no more evident than in the burgeoning field of stem cell research where therapeutic applications such as tissue and organ transplantation are being developed.

These cells have important, but restricted, clinical applications distinct from the wider range of possibilities with human embryonic stem cells (Wood, 2005).Unfortunately, the story began to unravel in late 2005 and by the next year it was clear that the results announced in Dr.Others, such as the U.S. and Germany, prohibit the use of federal funds for hESC research, but in the face of public pressure both countries have adopted national policies that allow the use of federal funds for stem cell lines created before August 2001 and May 2007, respectively.Isasi RM, Knoppers BM (2006): Beyond the permissibility of embryonic and stem cell research: substantive requirements and procedural safeguards.In the fetus, and even in an adult, stem cells can be found in many body tissues.Having the appearance of a human is problematic more because of our discomfort than because it necessarily raises some direct ethical dilemma.As with international stem cell regulations, tremendous variation can be found among different states (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2008).Because researchers throughout the world had chosen to not pursue SCNT, this line of research was set back a year or more.The symbolic cost associated to allowing the destruction of human embryos in ES cell research is primarily the undesirable capacity to diffuse or obscure the value we hold in this intrinsic property of life.

My recommendations for ways to demonstrate appropriate respect for the embryo based on its moral status are as follows.All this researcher has invented is a new way to commit a serious sin against God.Building upon her theory, Warren borrows from such figures as the environmental ethicist, J.One of the greatest advantages of the account of moral status I plan to offer is its ability to take a fundamental preference satisfying ethical framework and still compensate for fundamental human rights.

Ten Problems with Embryonic Stem Cell Research | The

Ensure the decisions to abort fetuses or discard IVF embryos is separate and distinct from decision to donate to ES cell research.Internationally, and certainly within the borders of the U.S., the majority of the public has recognized in this research a potential for a virtual revolution in medicine.